(Expected Reading Time: 3 minutes, 29 seconds)
Fast food workers in New York, St. Louis, Detroit, and Kansas City have recently ignited a national debate about minimum wage, calling for an increase from as low as $7.25 to $15.00 per hour.
Economists and businessmen are split on the issue of minimum wage. Some think that rising the wage kills jobs, while others say that a rise in the minimum wage has no negative impact on employment. In this article I'm jettisoning economics in favor of ethics. My goal is to bring this discussion down to the human level, and think about the ethics and morals of a $7.25 federal minimum hourly wage. I think we are losing focus on the morals and ethics of the situation by thinking about the almost entirely unknown economic consequences.
Core Moral Question: Should we have jobs where working 40 hours a week won't earn you enough to feed, clothe, and house your family without government assistance?
I'd say the answer is no. Let's take a look at what it takes to support a family on minimum wage.
Working 70 hours a week
In the world's most powerful country, minimum wage employees have to work 70+ hours in order to support their families. This 70+ hours figure comes from a budget released by McDonald's to help its employees live on the federal minimum wage. The updated budget for its minimum wage employees (including heat this time) reads as follows:
The CEO doesn't need this financial advice website, he makes $35,000+ every day.
The budget has already been blasted by hundreds of writers and bloggers, including Stephen Colbert, and shows an unbelievable lack of empathy and understanding.
McDonald's underlying message: "Our wage is fair. You'll be fine as long as you get a second job and learn some financial skills."
The gap between CEO and Employee
This McDonald's line of thinking if rife with contradictions. Should employees make $7.25 an hour while their CEO makes $4,375 per hour ($8.75 million per year)? Should an employee's full time earnings over a year (7.25*2000 hours), $14,500, equal what their CEO grosses in 3 hours and 19 minutes, less than half of one day of work? A McDonald's employee earning the federal minimum wage would have to work full-time for 603 years, 5 months, and 12 days before earning the annual salary of McDonald's CEO.
If only minimum wage employees were immortal...
The Costco Model
Of course, a company like McDonald's whose CEO makes $8.75 million per year and profits $5.5 billion per year can afford to pay its employees more, a lot more. Costco proves that such responsible business practices are both possible and profitable. It pays its hourly employees an average of $20.89 an hour, compared to full-time hourly employees at Walmart earning $12.67 an hour.
Says Costco CFO in the same Business Week Article,
“Could Costco make more money if the average wage was two or three dollars lower? The answer is yes. But we’re not going to do it.”
They also aren't going to give their employees condescending financial advice.
So Increase the National Minimum Wage?
Not so fast. The discussion gets more nuanced when you include small and medium companies. What's obvious for McDonald's is less black and white for smaller independent stores. Nationally set levels often overlook regional variation and the needs of a diverse business community.
So maybe small and medium companies shouldn't be forced to pay minimum wage if they can't afford such an increase. Then again, maybe companies that can't pay $15 and hour to workers supporting families don't have a suitable business model.
Conclusion - Keep Protesting
I applaud the fast food wage-increase protestors. Multinational companies like McDonald's need to be paying employees a higher wage, simple as that. And get this, they have the money to do so while still making a substantial profit. Even if they paid for the increase by raising prices, it would only result in a small prices increase, i.e. Dollar menu items would cost $1.17.
For companies like McDonald's, Walmart and YUM! Brands (Taco Bell, KFC, Pizza Hut), it's time to make an ethical, moral, and financial choice that guarantees a fair wage for employees.
In their own words, "Every Day and Every Dollar Make a Difference."
*** Update: Congrats to Seattle for raising their minimum wage to $15!
------
Kurt Berning
Hug the Rhino
For a better life




Its mind boggling how much a business will pay for a service but the skimp on their employees. Or the company they hire to do the service does the same. I work in security and the businesses that contract our services pay our company more than 3x per hour what i or any other employee get... Its crazy
ReplyDeleteA couple reasons why I object to raising the minimum wage to $15:
ReplyDeleteNot all jobs are meant to be "living wage", and that's a good thing. Raising the minimum wage would simply eliminate jobs that provide less than $15/hour worth in value. The impact that such a minimum wage would have on job openings available for youth or those with “unskilled” labor is especially stark. Young people can learn a lot from working during the summers or by working their way through school (and a lot of them work at large companies or for corporations that would be impacted by such a measure, even with exceptions for small business). With such a wage, people without particular skills or "unskilled" labor could be left out of any employment whatsoever, and without the ability to demonstrate to their employer their work ethic, dependability, etc. which would then provide them with the opportunity to get promoted, get a raise, or move up the ladder.
Using McDonald's as an example, roughly 70% of McDonald's restaurant managers started as a crew member. You aren't going to get a living wage if there isn't an entry-level job to begin with. Those restaurant mangers likely wouldn't be in that position if they didn't have the opportunity to have a job in the first place.
Also, I have a few questions. Is there something special about $15/hour? What would be your argument against having an even higher minimum wage(assuming you don't think it should be $20, $50, and so on)? You mention "substantial" profits regarding McDonalds? Is there an appropriate level of profit for a company or business?
A major concern for me with legislation like this is the arbitrary nature of it and the unintended consequences (regardless of the quality of one's intentions) that could follow.
Deuce
P.S. Dollar menus are awesome
P.P.S. I love you, man
P.P.P.S. Your fantasy team sucks
I too have concerns about raising the national minimum wage. Maybe an answer to the question is that the minimum wage is too simple a standard. A different policy might be higher minimum wages depending on age to foster the type of youth development that Daniel mentions. My threshold for minimum wage is that I want everyone who is working full time to not be living in poverty.
ReplyDeleteDaniel, I think you touched on a couple of answerable questions that underlie this debate. What's an appropriate level of profit? I'd say businesses should try to make as much money as possible. Well, given that they provide generous benefits to all employees (health, 401k, education), generous pay (a thriving wage, so higher than simply a living wage), and that their activities aren't having external negative consequences, such as destroying the environment or local communities. AKA Exxon Mobil probably shouldn't be allowed to make the kind of money that it does because of the company's environmental footprint.
As for what the wage should be, $15 is arbitrary in my mind. But it's certainly no more arbitrary than $7.25. I think people have advocated for that number because it's the type of living wage that could support a family in a large city.
Lastly, though the article has a black and white title, I somewhat backed away from that statement while exploring the idea of national minimum wage. Yes the national minimum wage should be raised, but probably not to $15. That said, I see no reason why wages for workers at Fast Food companies (especially those with families or experience) shouldn't be doubled. Especially in cases like Rett's, where the company is contracting out its services and making 3x what its paying the employees it sends, that seems extremely unfair.
Haha, and no need for conciliatory P.S.'s. You should've seen the comments on the Gun Control post...
Ha, you can never have too many P.S.'s.
ReplyDeleteWhat?!? Tempers flared w/a gun control post? Haha, I would've never guessed. Believe me, I have plenty of first hand experience with interesting (to say the least) comments from all sides whenever legislation involving guns is introduced, or even hinted at being introduced, in Congress.
And while I certainly think that companies and employers who offer such benefits are great, there's a big difference between supporting them for doing the right thing, and forcing those who don't to do so regardless of their circumstances. The implementation of the ACA in the US could serve as an example of unintended consequences. Many businesses are adjusting to the law by shifting employees to part-time employment to avoid certain health care requirements and the Administration deals with the issue by delaying the implementation of the law for employers. Even if the businesses didn't offer health insurance beforehand, their employees are now stuck working fewer hours and still not getting insurance via their employment. The good intentions of getting employers to expand benefits resulted in fewer working hours for many employees, all while still not offering insurance and leaving some workers worse off than they were before.
Similarly, I'm concerned that requiring the minimum wage to be a "living" wage would end up negatively impacting many of the people it is intended to help.
Having different standards based off age is intriguing, but the I can only imagine the complex mesh of regulations, inevitable loopholes, and court cases that would inevitably ensue from such an effort.
Not to go too far down a rabbit trail, but with Exxon, I don't have a problem with their profits. They certainly don't need any gov't subsidies (and I would strongly support ending those subsidies), but over the course of the past year, they made anywhere from 9-13% profit/quarter after taxes (https://www.google.com/finance?fstype=ii&q=NYSE:XOM). I don't view that as an obscene or unreasonable rate of return on an investment.
This comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteI think I tend to be in the same camp as Kurt on this issue. But for the sake of conversation...
ReplyDeleteI think probably the biggest obstacle for raising wages would be simply seeing the cost of living rise in tandem.
a good example of this would be cities like San Francisco. or even cities impacted by the North Dakota oil boom. But i suppose that's more due to strain on infrastructure caused by the sudden population growth.
But there is always a way. After all, we landed a human being on the moon and returned him safely earth. This should be easy after that...
I mean if raised wages are forced and businesses are somehow restricted from cutting hours or whatever.
Deleteburberry outlet
ReplyDeletecoach factory outlet online
ralph lauren
true religion jeans outlet
nike tn pas cher
ugg australia
fit flops
james shoes
michael kors outlet clearance
salvatore ferragamo shoes
zhi20170113
coach outlet online
ReplyDeletecoach outlet online
fendi bags
michael kors outlet
pandora jewelry
adidas
polo ralph lauren outlet
ed hardy uk
true religion jeans outlet
adidas
1706506yueqin
coach handbags
ReplyDeletecanada goose outlet
longchamp outlet online
cheap ray ban sunglasses
uggs outlet
ralph lauren polo
swarovski jewelry
nike roshe run
christian louboutin shoes
ugg boots clearance
20170913lck
2018115 leilei3915
ReplyDeletecoach outlet store online
mcm outlet
canada goose uk
nmd adidas
moncler jackets
coach outlet
pandora outlet
coach outlet
lunette ray ban
cheap ugg boots
nike air max
ReplyDeletedak prescott jersey
ferragamo handbags
dsquared2 outlet
air jordan 10
asics gel
10 deep clothing
jordan
vans pas cher
salvatore ferragamo shoes
20187.12huangliyue
curry 7 shoes
ReplyDeletehermes handbags
vans outlet
birkin bag
nike air max
hermes belt
jordan 13
golden goose outlet
lebron 17
mbt
(Coach Outlet Online) precisely anyone would want core night assistance to add a set of unaffordable kid's trainers, Makeup usage also another product Nstocksdstrom. (Michael Kors Outlet Store) Just about writing all emails with your (New Yeezys 2020) variety store leaped un answered, Too i am compelled if you want to actually can imagine..
ReplyDeletePosting: TGS speaker Christy Penders also warned the log it weren't area of the propane phrase that has been tapped, Nonetheless the aboveground system of the meter which usually logs onto around the undercover natural energy connection: "Almost all got hold of a (Jordan Shoes For Sale Online) call (Coach Outlet Clearance Sale) up clearly there seems to be a area that were smack by way of company. Particularly team went out and about with, I do believe, The hearth section usually (Ray Ban Outlet) clamped the cloths line, Understanding that ceased the blood circulation using passing of the (Cheap Yeezys For Sale) cost of wind to the actual (New Jordan Releases 2020) market ok (Ray Ban Outlet Store) straightaway. We accompanied to guarantee the all the equipment came to be acceptable, On top of that cutoff plan to the road.
The reconstruction method captures unique architectural Coach Outlet differences New Jordan Shoes 2020 between lines, such as leaf angle, curvature, and leaf density, thus providing a sensitive method of evaluating the productivity of actual canopy structures Ray Ban Outlet that previously were difficult or impossible to obtain. We show that complex data on Yeezy Discount light distribution can be automatically obtained without conventional manual measurements. We use a mathematical model of photosynthesis parameterized by field data consisting of chlorophyll fluorescence, light Coach Outlet Store response curves of carbon dioxide assimilation, and manual confirmation of Yeezy Boost 350 canopy architecture and light attenuation.
ReplyDeleteThere was little suspense in this one. Elliott reeled in Ray Ban Glasses Kevin Harvick with 27 laps remaining and closed out the victory. Elliott also won the Truck Series race Tuesday night at Charlotte to give him a pair of victories in a four race stretch at the Coach Handbags Clearance track located just a few minutes away from Hendrick Motorsports headquarters..
BB74AA3799
ReplyDeleteTelegram Show Kanalı
Whatsapp Görüntülü Show Numaraları
Görüntülü Şov Whatsapp Numarası
Görüntülü Seks
Şov Numarası
Canli Web Cam Show
Whatsapp Ücretli Show
ABF459B91E
ReplyDeleteTakipçi Satın Al
Cami Süpürgesi
En İyi Aksiyon Filmleri